Global Fund: Better concept notes, more effective funding
The Technical Review Panel, which analyses the technical merit of all funding applications to the Global Fund, reviewed 23 concept notes in July. It was the second window of concept notes to come up for review this year under the new funding model, after 10 applications were assessed in June.
The panel, known as the TRP, has also taken the opportunity to
provide some more feedback to applicants on how to build the
strongest possible case for funding. Bringing together experts
in the three diseases and in broader development issues, the TRP
found overall that concept notes are improving in quality,
noting that some were especially robust.
Following a
number of recommendations made in July after the first review
window, the TRP has now made some further suggestions, five of
them general and six technical, identifying areas where concept
notes could be strengthened. Here is a summary of the latest
recommendations:
One: Focus on Key Populations
The TRP concluded that many applicants could do
more to address key populations, seen as essential to achieving
the best possible impact at a time when resources are scarce.
The panel also urged applicants to use epidemiological data to
identify key populations, while drawing on best practice to
guide the selection and design of interventions.
Addressing
the rights of women and girls and those of young people who are
at high risk of infection is important. The TRP also noted that
interventions that support social and human rights have an
important role to play alongside medical interventions.
Two: Sustainability Is Key
Applicants were encouraged by the TRP to make sure
that programs are sustainable, no matter how much longer the
Global Fund is expected to provide financial support to the
country.
The panel sets much store by measures that
help achieve this goal, such as integrating disease programs
into the national health system; building capacity; and
bolstering health data collection and monitoring and evaluation
systems. The TRP also urged countries to support outreach to key
populations through domestically funded programs, ideally giving
a role to civil society organizations.
Three: Getting the Program Split Right
The TRP stressed that the breakdown of funding or
“program split” between eligible diseases and health
systems strengthening contained in the allocation letter is not
intended to be prescriptive but is for information only.
CCMs
should engage in a robust country dialogue with all interested
parties before agreeing on a program split. The concept note
should then give a clear rationale for the program split,
regardless of whether the CCM has decided to adhere to the split
contained in the allocation letter or to make significant
changes.
Four: Improving the Quality of Concept Notes
The TRP said it was looking for more detail and
consistency in budgeting and for evidence that health system
strengthening is being adequately funded.
Five: Prioritizing for Greatest Impact
A clear presentation of priorities is strongly
encouraged, showing how strategic choices can secure maximum
impact of Global Fund investments against the three diseases and
enhance health systems strengthening. Applicants are also urged
to draw on geographical and demographic data and the experience
they have gained from implementing previous programs in order to
set clear priorities in their concept notes.
Countries
that are eligible to apply for funding above the allocation
amount should also make a clear distinction in their concept
note between interventions that fall within the allocated amount
and those that are outside its scope and therefore would require
additional funding.
The TRP also made six technical
recommendations:
One: WHO guidelines on antiretroviral therapy
Countries should strategically implement the
WHO’s 2013 ART guidelines, which call for starting
treatment at an earlier stage in the progress of the disease,
with care. The move towards an earlier start to treatment should
take into account overall treatment coverage and prevention
activities. Recommendations in the WHO guidelines also need to
be factored in, with a strategy to reach priority populations
first. Applicants are encouraged to ensure their concept notes
have a sufficient focus on prevention before moving to more
ambitious treatment protocols. Without appropriate prevention
efforts, ART will ultimately prove unaffordable and, therefore,
unsustainable.
Two: Balancing investment in core DOTS and PMDT
Countries should prioritize case detection and the
immediate treatment of all newly identified cases, maintaining
and enhancing the performance of their basic TB program while
building or expanding the capacity for programmatic management
of drug resistant TB (PMDT). Barriers to accessing diagnostic
and treatment services for general and key populations should be
assessed, and countries should consider appropriate alternative
service models to improve TB case detection and treatment
support, drawing on lessons from pilot projects locally and
globally. Countries should ensure the provision of a
comprehensive package of services for PMDT that includes case
detection, treatment and adherence.
Three: Joint TB and HIV concept notes
HIV, TB and TB/HIV interventions were given
reasonable consideration in the joint concept notes, and the TRP
had no serious concerns about the technical quality of the TB
sections of the proposals. However, the TRP felt that TB and HIV
experts may have failed to collaborate sufficiently in the
preparation of joint concept notes. Some were significantly
stronger for one of the two diseases. The TRP encourages joint
concept note applicants to prepare an integrated concept note
that reflects an appropriate balance of TB, HIV and TB/HIV
activities, as indicated by the epidemiology of the country and
known funding gaps.
Four: Working across Borders to Fight Malaria
Countries should make use of sub-national
epidemiological data as a basis for prioritizing their
interventions against malaria in resource-constrained
environments. Countries should also collaborate with their
neighbors to guard against a resurgence of malaria in border
areas where progress is being made towards eliminating the
disease.
Five: Health Systems Strengthening
The TRP said health systems strengthening is
crucial to ensuring that programs are sustainable and in
leveraging efforts by countries to fight the three diseases. In
general, eligible applicants should therefore allocate money to
HSS in their disease concept notes or in a separate concept note
that specifically addresses health system strengthening.
Strategic
investments in health systems can help maximize the impact of
disease-related interventions and contribute to
sustainability.
Six: Addressing Human Rights and Gender Issues
The TRP also urged applicants to include specific
community, human rights and gender interventions in their
concept notes that are adequately budgeted for and focus on key
populations.
The TRP encouraged a stronger focus on
interventions that work to change social norms rather than
placing too much emphasis on purely medical interventions.
Source:
Global Fund News Flash