New approaches to understanding TB can help inform development of better vaccine
With upwards of 2 billion individuals infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) each year, the infection continues to pose a serious challenge on a global scale. Although advances have been made in the fight against the disease, much is left to be desired when it comes to diagnostic, treatment, and prevention options.
In the Monday (March 5) plenary at the
25th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic
Infections
(CROI), JoAnne Flynn, PhD, from the University of Pittsburgh,
stressed the importance of gleaning a better understanding of
the pathogenesis of tuberculosis (TB) in order to develop new,
effective vaccines that will be able to offer much needed
protection against the disease.
There are several reasons why TB has remained such a serious
global problem. Firstly, the diagnostics available to detect the
disease are incredibly outdated, and, as such, many individuals
never receive a diagnosis despite having active TB, according to
Dr. Flynn. Secondly, although effective treatment is available,
the regimen is long—at least 6 months minimum—and is
known to cause several side effects. Finally, of course, is the
growing problem of resistance, with many strains of the disease
becoming resistant to drugs used in the standard care regimen.
It doesn’t help that the ultimate preventive weapon in our
arsenal, Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) or is not
very effective either. “It is still given to a lot of
babies worldwide, but I will tell you that most people who die
of TB were vaccinated with BCG. So, clearly, we need to do
better in terms of a vaccine,” shared Dr. Flynn. Poor
access to health care is another contributing factor, as
“this is a disease of poor people,” she added.
Within 2 years of being infected by having inhaled the bacterium
through the air, a small percentage of individuals will develop
active tuberculosis, what Dr. Flynn refers to as symptomatic
disease. “However, most people will contain the infection
through their immune response and have latent TB, which is
simply clinically asymptomatic infection,” Dr. Flynn
stressed. “Those people will most likely remain infected
for the rest of their lives.” When the disease is
asymptomatic, individuals may never learn of their infections
but nonetheless, they run the risk of reactivation in time which
could result in the active form of the disease, which is
transmissible.
“We don’t know what leads to this risk of
reactivation. Is it bacterial burden? Is it host response? There
are a lot of things that we still don’t know about
that,” Dr. Flynn admitted.
What do we know? For one, it’s better to prevent
infection in the first place than concentrate on treating an
individual once they are infected. The ultimate form of
prevention is a better vaccine.
Although there are no definitive criteria on what would be
required to develop a better vaccine against TB, according to
Dr. Flynn there are at least a few aspects that need to be taken
into consideration that we already know:
- T cells are important; they are needed to activate macrophages (which house the infection) to kill the bacteria. Thus, cell-mediated immunity is important. We need to know what kind of T cells are needed and where they need to be.
- Although not typically thought of when it comes to TB, antibodies may offer a potential way to vaccinate against the disease. However, currently, there is little data to suggest this is possible.
- The current vaccine is an attenuated version of the Mycobacterium species that’s missing some of the immunodominant antigens from TB. We need to learn more about whether or those antigens matter.
“We don’t have a vaccine that is truly effective,
and we have no correlates as to how to make that vaccine,”
Dr. Flynn lamented. “Therefore, in the HIV world, you guys
are much further along than we are in the TB world.”
Perhaps most importantly, in order to create a better vaccine, a
better understanding of the pathogenesis of tuberculosis is
especially important, and it is for that reason that Dr. Flynn
provided conference goers with a crash course into what happens
in the lung when someone is infected with the disease.
“The granuloma is the pathological hallmark of TB,”
she said. “[It] is basically the host response to
infection. What we know from our studies is that each individual
bacillus that you inhale will form an individual granuloma in
the lungs,” some of which will work, and some of which
won’t, which further complicates the understanding of
TB.
In order to study how they granulomas form, Dr. Flynn and
colleagues use animal models, particularly using different
macaques, as they “recapitulate the entire spectrum of
infection outcomes seen in humans—everything from latent
to active TB,” she said.
In order to watch how infection spreads in real-time, the Dr.
Flynn and her team developed an imaging modality called PET/CT,
which uses fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) as a probe, just like in
cancer studies. As each granuloma takes up some of the FDG, it
allows the investigators to measure the level of inflammation or
metabolic activity for each granuloma.
Dr. Flynn exemplified how dynamic and heterogeneous granulomas
are through the use of a few of the scans; they showed that
while some granulomas in 1 lung lobe essentially went away,
granulomas in another lung lobe grew worse, became inflamed, and
grew in size. “These 2 things are happening
simultaneously,” she explained. “[That evidence,]
along with a lot of other data [tell us] that each granuloma has
its own trajectory and it doesn’t care at all what the
other granulomas in the lungs are doing.”
The team also used the macaque models to further their
understanding of reactivation. They gave anti-tumor necrosis
factor (TNF) to 26 monkeys with latent TB for the duration of 8
weeks. “Anti-TNF drugs are used for a variety of
inflammatory diseases and we’ve known from mouse models
that TNF is a very important cytokine in TB,” Dr. Flynn
explained.
They performed PET/CT imaging before giving the anti-TNF, and
subsequently at 4 weeks and 8 weeks after anti-TNF. “We
defined reactivation very strictly,” said Dr. Flynn.
“We said reactivation is going to be the formation of a
new granuloma after anti-TNF. When we defined it that way, it
turned out that half of the monkeys reactivated in 8 weeks and
half of the monkeys did not.” To predict which subjects
would reactivate and which would not, they created a
“simple algorithm” which looked at the total amount
of FDG, or the total inflammation in the lungs. “When we
did that, we can see that the monkey who would reactivate had
prior inflammation in the lungs, compared to those who would
not, prior anti-TNF,” she said.
Looking at latent controls, the team sought out to predict which
monkeys would reactivate using the algorithm they defined.
“We wanted to see, what’s the difference between
monkeys given no anti-TNF at all?” she said.
Although there were many differences, Dr. Flynn highlighted 1 in
particular: monkeys who were not given anti-TNF, who were at
high-risk for reactivation had a granuloma with high levels of
bacteria. “What that means is, only 1 granuloma will put
you at risk for reactivation,” she explained.
What about reinfection? There is currently no way to know if
someone who has latent TB is reinfected because diagnostics for
this aren’t available, according to Dr. Flynn. After
considering past research suggesting that Mtb infection
may have protective qualities, the investigators decided to
conduct another study which found “robust concomitant
immunity in TB,” where fewer granulomas establish, the
bacteria establish don’t grow to the same level, and the
TB in the reinfection granulomas are killed more
efficiently,” according to Dr. Flynn. “All of this
results in a 10,000-fold protection of bacterial burden compared
to naïve animals. And the protection is far superior to
boosted BCG. What this tells us is that a vaccine may have to
mimic TB to become very effective.”
Although there are many challenges to understanding TB, the team
highlighted that it’s important to understand that
heterogeneity is a very important aspect of the disease. One bad
granuloma could result in dissemination and reactivation,
according to Dr. Flynn, and in order to prevent disease, a
vaccine would need to succeed in all granulomas. However, when
these clues and research are taken into consideration, improved
vaccines and interventions may soon be underway.
Source:
Contagion Live