Smartphone app monitors on daily TB therapy
Johns Hopkins researchers report success with a smart phone video-based app that substitutes for a daily in-person visit by a health care worker required for tuberculosis treatment known as directly observed therapy, or DOT. The preliminary study showed that the app may be less costly and may improve privacy concerns raised by patients compared to in-person visits.
A summary of the study that investigated the app, which provides
video Directly Observed Therapy (video DOT), was published on
April 26 in Open Forum Infectious Diseases.
"We believe video DOT offers an alternative that
appears to be as effective as an in-person daily visits by
health care workers to assure compliance with drug treatment,
but also empowers patients to manage their TB without added
stress," says Samuel Holzman, M.D., a research fellow in the
department of infectious diseases at the Johns Hopkins
University School of Medicine.
Tuberculosis is one of
the few diseases in the U.S. with state and federal provisions
outlining recommended and sometimes required measures to ensure
that patients adhere to treatment. These recommendations include
provisions for home or hospital based isolation or occasionally
forced isolation for infectious individuals. Treatment for
tuberculosis is effective and benefits not only the patient, but
the public by reducing the chances of ongoing transmission.
The
reason for these mandates, says Holzman, is the disease's
virulence. Unlike the flu or the common cold, Mycobacterium
tuberculosis, the bacteria that causes infectious tuberculosis,
can hang in the air for extended periods when expelled by the
coughs or saliva of patients, spreading to others across a room
or through a building's ventilation. Many people with active TB
also have relatively few symptoms, allowing the bacteria to
spread before a diagnosis is made.
Tuberculosis is
typically treated for six months with a battery of daily
antibiotics that include a multidrug combination that can be
challenging patients to take. The number of side-effects related
to the drugs and the motivation needed to continue the long
treatment courses can cause patients to stop their treatment
early without appropriate monitoring and strong support.
Treatments become even more intensive when caring for multidrug
or extensively drug-resistant TB, which require additional
antibiotics and can take up to two years to bring under
control.
As such, most local health departments in
the U.S. require that health care workers observe patients
taking their medications to document that they were taken
correctly and to monitor for side-effects. In most cases,
in-person DOT is conducted five days a week on weekdays and is
therefore costly and resource-intensive for local departments of
health who absorb the costs associated with treatment.
Nonetheless,
this practice helps to support patients through the difficult
regimen and provides clinicians a means of tracking a patient's
progress and in-person DOT is the standard of care for TB
treatment in the US and globally. However, DOT has the potential
to be logistically challenging for patients and is viewed by
some patients as stigmatizing or interfering with their autonomy
and privacy.
"In an era when we are focused on
patient centered care, having to meet a health provider every
single day is logistically challenging and can be personally
invasive," says Maunank Shah, M.D., Associate Professor of
Medicine in the Department of Infectious Diseases at the Johns
Hopkins University School of Medicine.
To test the
effectiveness of video DOT, the researchers conducted a pilot
study utilizing the widely-available smartphone application
developed by emocha Mobile Health in conjunction with Shah and
other clinician-scientists at the Johns Hopkins University
School of Medicine.
28 adult TB patients being
treated at three health departments in Maryland participated in
the pilot study. These patients had their therapy monitored
using the emocha video DOT application in lieu of in-person
visits by a health care worker.
The researchers found
that patient adherence to treatment was approximately the same
between the video DOT and in-person DOT, 94 percent and 98
percent respectively. As importantly, when including weekends
and holidays in the assessment of adherence, the researchers
found that the overall proportion of prescribed doses that were
verified through observation was 6 percent higher with video DOT
compared to in-person DOT.
The researchers also
sought to assess the app's acceptability to patients and
clinicians by conducting qualitative interviews and surveys. Ten
patients and sixteen staff were interviewed and/or completed
surveys after the study. One hundred percent of the patients
felt that the emocha platform was 'easy to use' and preferred it
over in-person DOT. Staff were largely in agreement with these
results and 94 percent reported they believed that video DOT was
'effective for monitoring patient adherence'. The researchers
also reported several common themes during in depth interviews
that focused on the added convenience and increased flexibility
of using video DOT. Another prominent theme was the impression
that in-person DOT could risk patient privacy.
The
researchers also found that when compared to 5-Day/week
in-person visits, video DOT was estimated to cost an average of
$674 per patient, compared with $2,065 for in-person DOT. Given
potential variability in the costs of software, internet data
usage, mobile phones, and other components of video DOT, the
researchers estimated the range of costs to implement video DOT
at health departments could range from $66 to $1,449 per patient
for a standard six month treatment course.
Overall,
the investigators found that ninety percent of traditional
in-person DOT costs are spent on health worker services. The
video DOT costs were mostly in the software, phones and their
data plans, with labor accounting for only 20 percent of the
cost. In this study, 25 patients (89 percent) elected to use
their own devices, leading to potential additional health
department cost savings.
Overall, the researchers
found that video DOT provides a patient-centered approach to TB
treatment monitoring that offers patients improved flexibility
and privacy, while allowing health departments the ability to
document and support treatment adherence.
A
limitation of the study is its small sample size and
non-randomization. As such, the researchers say the results may
not be applicable to all patients, but they see video DOT as a
promising technology for helping TB programs around the world
manage TB.
Because the app allows patients to record
their doses without a health worker present, the researchers are
hopeful that the app may facilitate more medication observation,
even on weekends.
MiDOT is one of three video-based
technologies that allows for asynchronous recording of patients
taking prescribed antibiotic doses. Another is named Aricure
that uses artificial intelligence to monitor patients, and
another is SureAdhere. Other video DOT technologies listed by
the CDC include Face Time, Fuze, HippaBridge, ooVoo, Skype, and
Tango.
Source:
Medical Xpress